I hope to combine the theory attained during
the introduction to Web 1.0, and my working knowledge of a school library,
within this blog-post. Web 1.0 comprises of The Internet, the World Wide Web,
Databases and Information Retrieval; according to Richard Butterworth, the terms
‘internet’ and ‘world wide web’ are used interchangeably. He states, there is
an important difference: to take a motoring analogy, the internet is the road
and the World Wide Web is a type of car that you can drive around on that road.
It was in 1960, the onset of a worldwide
network of networks developed, allowing computers in remote locations the
ability to share information and communicate with each-other. This development
has reinvented and continues to reinvent the way we communicate, gain
knowledge, consume, and even the way we think. The ease at which we can access
programs, files, data and other resources from central computers is phenomenal
due to the advent of the Internet. The World Wide Web however, is the means by
which we access the information that is on the internet, developed in 1990; it
is not the only means of communication via the internet another example is
email. With the introduction of the World Wide Web searching
for relevant information on the World Wide Web is often a frustrating task,
especially for students. Yes, the Internet can be a
valuable extension to the school's library collection. But it is mammoth in
scale, unordered, and mainly unchecked. According to Christoph Hölscher and Gerhard Strube,
“The accelerated growth of the World Wide Web
has turned the Internet into an immense information space with diverse and
often poorly organized content. Online users are confronted with rapidly
increasing amounts of information as epitomized by the buzzword
"information overload." While skills necessary for browsing
individual websites seem to be available to users after only minimal training
(Hurtienne and Wandtke, 1997), considerably more experience is required for
query-based searching (Pollock and Hockley, 1997) and inter-site navigation.”
Within a school library environment
knowing what Uniform Resource Locator or URL to click on can be overwhelming as
a student, especially when search engines give a plethora of options, which aren’t
necessarily ranked in order of relevance. Search engines, for instance Google
aren’t always reliable in terms of content posted as the “best match”; this then
continues to considerably validate the role of a school librarian, in that there
is so much information out there, someone has to sort through it and make it
palpable for the relevant audience ‘The
essential problem in information representation and retrieval remains how to
obtain the right information for the right user at the right time’ (Chu, 2003).
A key factor
is dissemination of information, and ALEXANDRIA is a database management
system, that has been utilised and it houses the titles of all forms of media
within the school library and makes it quite simple to search the content of
the library as well as combining the web, which allows for a wider scope of
information; without getting lost in the shelves. A database is defined as an integrated
collection of data shareable between users and application systems. The DBMS is
the complex piece of software, which acts as the interface between the users
and the data. (Richard Butterworth)
It is through Database Management
Systems, like Alexandria which is utilised within a school environment,
information is organized in keeping with the student’s needs and queries. In
order to obtain the information, Standard Query Language (SQL) commands allocate
the information for the student. Computers do not understand normal language;
they instead read and interpret a binary code by assigning a bit string to each
particular symbol or instruction like ASCII text and it is the foundation from
which documents like database records and web pages are formed. Computers do not
understand normal language; they instead look for the metadata within the
component in order to display the desired information. (HTML) and Hypertext is
the language that is used within web pages to link various documents together
and allows the information to be read and understood by the Browser used to
carry out the search. Peter Brophy states that need will be expressed in many
ways, and will be interpreted and turned into requests for information objects. (P114)
Information is attained through
direct commands within the database; however the request made by the student
requires far less complicated measures and it is done through the use of natural
language.
Information retrieval searches can
be done via natural language and controlled vocabularies, which is, through a
particular question or phrase fed into the search engine, or more precise
wording for a more direct result. To attain these results, Boolean operators are
utilised.
” A Boolean search
strategy retrieves those documents which are ‘true’ for the query. This
formulation only makes sense if the queries are expressed in terms of index
terms (or keywords) and combined by the usual logical connectives AND OR and
NOT.” (van Rijsbergen, C. J.)
For students who frequently use
Google or Bing search engines this is a particularly useful skill especially as
it refines the search and targets their desired results more specifically. As a
librarian, one of the tasks is to demonstrate the use of Boolean terms in hope
of aiding the students in their research.
Student’s needs are usually Informational, and information will be
present on more than one page. Information
seekers develop strategies for finding, choosing and using information. Their
strategies are built on three skill areas: reading, information –handling and
technical. Brophy p 45
I believe that the library can position itself to be the provider of such
skills needed to efficiently gain information from the Web, without subjecting
oneself to Information Overload. The adaptation of the library within the
curriculum development within schools will help students in their quest for
knowledge and more so in accurate information retrieval.
References
Broder, A. (2002). A taxonomy of web search SIGIR Forum Fall, 36(2).
Brophy, Peter (2007), The Library in the twenty-first Century 2nd ed, London:
Facet Publishing
Chu, H. (2003), Information representation and retrieval in the digital age,
New Jersey: Information today.
Hölscher Christoph and Gerhard
Strube, Web
Search Behavior of Internet Experts and Newbies http://www9.org/w9cdrom/81/81.html
MacFarlane Andy, Richard Butterworth, and Jason Dykes (2011), Lecture 02: The Internet and the World Wide Web INM348 Digital Information Technologies and Architectures, London : City
University http://moodle.city.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=267300
MacFarlane Andy, Richard Butterworth, and Jason Dykes (2011), Lecture 03: Structuring and
querying information stored in databases, INM348 Digital Information
Technologies and Architectures , London : City University
MacFarlane Andy, Lecture 04: Information
Retrieval , INM348 Digital Information Technologies and
Architectures, London : City University
van Rijsbergen, C. J. Information
Retrieval. London: Butterworths, 1979. Available at http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/Preface.html
Chpt 5
Zakon, R.
H. (2005), Hobbes' Internet Timeline.
From the launch of Sputnik to the World Wide Web as we know it - this chronological list of events contributing to the development of the Internet is perhaps the definitive history.
web: http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/
From the launch of Sputnik to the World Wide Web as we know it - this chronological list of events contributing to the development of the Internet is perhaps the definitive history.
web: http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/
No comments:
Post a Comment